An empirical evaluation of devolving administrative control to Costa Rican hospital and clinic directors.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the early 2000s, Costa Rica implemented comprehensive reforms of its health care system, including devolving administrative power from the central government to some providers that remain part of the national system. In this article, we evaluate how this aspect of the reform affected clinic efficiency and population health by analyzing administrative data on regional providers and mortality rates in local areas. We compare changes in outcomes across time between areas that signed performance contracts with the central government and received limited budgetary control to those that continued to be managed directly by the central government. We believe the reform created opportunities for providers to become more efficient and effective. Our results suggest that the reform significantly decreased costs without adversely affecting quality of care or population health.
منابع مشابه
“It’s Practically a Must”: Neoliberal Reasons for Foreign Language Learning
This qualitative study analyzes the reasons of college students for learning English as a foreign language (EFL) in Costa Rica and the reasons of high school students for learning German as a foreign language (GFL) in the US. It asks to what extent the learners’ reasons align with or deviate from neoliberal discourses that commodify foreign languages. The analysis of 27 interviews in a US high ...
متن کاملKnowledge of prenatal health care among Costa Rican and Panamanian women.
OBJECTIVES There is evidence that health care during pregnancy is a crucial component in ensuring a safe delivery. Because the infant mortality rate in Costa Rica is almost half the rate of Panama, the researchers tested the hypothesis that women in Costa Rica are more knowledgeable about prenatal health care than women in neighboring Panama. METHODS A multiple-choice survey was used to evalu...
متن کاملHospital Accreditation Surveyors' Evaluation Criteria in Iran
Background and Aim: Hospital accreditation is an external evaluation strategy used to improve the quality and effectiveness of services. Accreditation surveyors are among the important factors affecting the validity of accreditation results. Since the effectiveness of an accreditation system depends on its surveyors, the aim of this study is to identify the evaluation criteria of hospital accre...
متن کاملEvaluation and prioritization of occupational safety and health risks of Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd in 2019
Introduction: Today, it is essential to pay attention to the opportunities and threats in health services, especially in hospitals, to identify and evaluate the existing risks and manage them in these centers. Hospital risk management is a program to reduce the occurrence and prevalence of preventable accidents and is of great economic, human and moral importance in the hospital environment. Th...
متن کاملبررسی و اولویتبندی عوامل تحول اداری در ایران: سازمانهای دولتی شهر تهران
Today, it looks rather tangibly and conclusively imperative to give rise to changes throughout the state administrate system. It appears quite critical to establish a meritorious and efficient administrate system as well as to detect the factors influencing it in an endeavor to meet the goals of the development plans. The main purpose of this research could be verbalized as surveying and priori...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation
دوره 45 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015